Why Europeans alliance with the Jews ?

January 18th, 2009
Yitzhak asked:


Because the Europeans realize they can not confront the Arabs without the help of the Jews who control international politics and the world economy , Arab countries have massive economic wealth is unexploited because of Israeli intervention against Arab countries assisting the Jews in Europe gatekeepers in the political decision-making EU … Europeans ignorant of Jewish control at the present time because they are trying to absolve themselves in the future after the collapse of Arab regimes and the Arab citizens restore the rule of their country … Then Europeans will say that the Jews are responsible for the ills of the Arabs and Europeans alliance with the Arabs against Jews .

This era’s three presidents, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft, and Woodrow Wilson, presided over a federal

January 17th, 2009
FLACA asked:


goverment beginning to assert its power to regulate the national economy, tax citizens directly, legislate social policies for the protection of the relatively poor and powerless, and involve the U.S. as a great power in the conduct of international politics. Two of those presidents, Roosevelt and Wilson, also began to define the twentieth-century presidency as the source of legislative initiative, the head of a vastly expanded federal bureaucracy empowered to enforced regulations of its own making, and to push the constitutional limits of its authority.

Explain and discuss how Wilson and Roosevelt changed the role of the presidency in legislative initiatives and how they made the presidency more powerful during their terms in office!

What do they ask about in uni interviews for international relations or politics?

January 16th, 2009
Ergeta M asked:


Aside for the usual personalised questions, what general questions do they ask at uni interview for international relations and politics?

What can I do with an International Relations degree right after graduation?

January 8th, 2009
papillion_mon_amour asked:


I am scared about the job market today.
I am currently at Mount Holyoke College, but for family reasons I need to transfer to Lewis & Clark College next year.
I plan on completing an undergraduate degree in International Relations.
Also, I am planning on attending law school, but before that, i would like to earn some money. What are some lucrative endeavors that could come with an International Relations degree? Also, would it be wise to get a MBA in International Business instead of law school>

Are you able to filter out questions made by foreigners on YA! politics?

January 5th, 2009
Chimpy McFlightsuit asked:


Seems like a lot of foreign lobbies logged on today to spread their agenda that obviously does not benefit America. I wish they would go to the international sites and troll there instead.
nicko, i like the turkey guy. There’s alot of crap from India and BNP. Then alot of Israeli agents who pound their agenda.

What Bachelors should I go for if I want to study International Relations?

January 5th, 2009
Bub D asked:


I am interested in the field of International Relations. I was wondering what are your thought on what BA I should get if I want to get a masters in International Relations? Should I get my BA in International relations as well, or maybe something more like political science? I would appreciate any help

International Relations/Studies Major?

January 1st, 2009
mochacat asked:


Hi, I will be going into college next year, and have been interested in the International Relations or Studies major, because I love different cultures,traveling, and world politics. I am also really good at languages so I think this might interest me a lot! So I was wondering if this is a good area to major in and what careers it leads to? What would be the best college to go to, Georgetown?

How would a transporter beam affect society?

December 31st, 2008
dudde asked:


I received this question as a homework assignment. The date is May 31, 2058 and it is exactly 20 years since a company released a transporter beam capable of transporting both living and inorganic objects between any two points on the Earth. The point is to describe how it has changed any of employment, manufacturing, transportation, education, travel or politics. You also have to describe how it would impact countries that could not afford the technology. Any ideas that aren’t obvious like roads becoming obselete, living and working in different places or international travel becoming instant?
I believe it is instantaneous transportation, but the assignment wasn’t clear as to whether or not a country would have to purchase incoming/outgoing stations for itself, and whether or not those would have to be transported there and how they would.
And a question, why would more people work from home with the transporter beam being invented?
This is what I’ve done so far:

“Beam me up, Scotty!” This famous catch phrase was made famous by Captain Kirk on the hit show Star Trek nearly 90 years ago, lest did the writers know that less than a century later, it could be done for real. As we’ve hit the 20th birthday of the Transporter Beam released by the Boolean Institute, I thought this would be a great time to reflect on what it has done for our civilization.
Walking, driving and flying; these are all methods of transportation that have been left in the past in most modern countries today. The ability to travel in an instant has revolutionized the way we do business. Importing and exporting used to be done by ship or maybe even plane, today it is done simply by loading the transporter beam. International trade has become simple, with products being moved between wealthy countries with ease.

But some countries like Russia are unwilling to make the switch to the Transporter Beam fully and use the technology sparingly just
like the former French airplane the Concorde. The cost of the outgoing and incoming stations for the Beam would cost a substantial amount for Russia, something they do not want to harm their economy. But both Canada and the United States have become reliant on the Transporter Beam, which uses a technology mimicking the speed of sound for people to travel around the world.
I had a moment to catch up with the Prime Minister of Canada, Mr. James Rose, and he told me, “The Transporter Beam has changed everything about our lives. We do business easily; have more times for things we enjoy and can travel to another part of the world in seconds. The only negative to the Beam is the harm it causes countries who cannot afford it, who lose lots of commercial interest.”

As I analyzed what the Prime Minster said, I was intrigued by the final thing he mentioned. Since the Transporter Beam has come to life, very few of us have thought about the countries that cannot afford the technology. The entir
continent of Africa, still full of raw materials to die for, has not improved for the past 20 years and much of it still lies impoverished. The Transporter Beam’s cost would still cost countries in Africa too much of their annual GDPs. Until the switch to the Transporter Beam is made, countries in Africa and even parts of South America will be left out of the world’s economic picture.
But the Transporter Beam certainly has made life in North America a lot easier. With an estimated 73% of people working outside of their home province, many can finally find a job that suits them personally.

What are the consequences of a bad image of a goverment?

December 27th, 2008
Gerardo H asked:


Parliament Members
National and International Cosnequences regarding politics, economics, etc.
Governments in Latin America and Eastern Asia

Does the Socialist International assume that the Democrats will win? Why were their delegations at the DNC?

December 25th, 2008
aural marginalized asked:


The Socialist International already has an “official” liason in the US—the Democratic Socialist Party of America.

So why did they jump the gun and send delegations to Denver?

Why is the Socialist International NOW wishing to “expand inter-party relations with the Democrats” in the US?

August 26, 2008, 9:36 CET

Hungarian Socialists eager to cement ties with US Democrats

The ruling Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) seeks to expand relations with the US Democratic Party, a senior Socialist politician told Hungarian reporters in Washington on Monday.

Monika Lamperth is heading an MSZP delegation to the Democratic Party Convention as the personal envoy of party chairman and prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsany.

[Gyurcsany, a former Communist Youth Leader, recently became Vice President of the Socialist International]

“Our visit is intended to strengthen and, in some areas, expand inter-party relations with the Democrats,” she said.

——from politics. hu

Um, what does it mean when International Socialists seek “inter-party relations?” What about the Obama/Biden ticket is so attractive to them?

Do they assume that Americans will be intimidated by the coercive manipulations of speculators behind the Obama ticket?

good grief look what I just found:

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1892